
As i mentioned in a previous post the very first succulents I ever grew were kalanchoe plantlets from Mr "Ratty" Roberts the biology teacher at Wintringham. The first cactus was a rat-tail cactus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disocactus_flagelliformis from a jumble sale while the first succulent (also from a jumble sale) was an aloe. At the time I would not have been able to tell you that it was Aloe humilis but now - 35 years later - I would be able to because there it is in the picture above. Not my particular specimen but identical to the first succulent I ever paid for all those years ago. As i said before I had a wee windowsill collection before i went off to Uni and then began my travels for work etc and I wonder if it is significant that only now am I starting another collection of cacti and succulents, - We had a few cacti in the council flat we lived in in Seaton Aberdeen - a few mammillaria and a couple of huge christmas and easter cacti (which we still had). However even though we were there for 20 years all told it didn't feel like home, wasn't ours. Now our place in tipperty does feel like homeso now I can start to do a bit of collecting because after the 40 years of travel I am settled again.
It won't be much of a collection because I have to suppress the collecting bug for money, commonsense, and time reasons, but it will be a wee collection. And the reality of mortality kind of destroys the obsession behincollecting for me. There is no real reason to make a mega collection when I know that anything I do will be split up after I die, or even worse the plants, books, music or whatever will be throw away and destroyed when I'm gone. How pointless does that make collecting. It's a bugger this mortality thing.
When i was a teenager - well before i had any kids i guess - mortality wasn't an issue because that was way in the future - as it should be - no one would want kids to truely face the inevitability of death. That was when i could be obsessive about collecing (and I was) - but now - now it just isn't worth it.
What a miserable post this is. Anywho below are some more piccies of some of the other succulents in the cactus house. Is "the cactus house" the name of a novel? Maybe it should be - maybe it will be.... let me just think of a plot - boy meets girls, boy loses girls, boy gets cactus collection, boy falls in love with talking cactus, talking cactus turns out to be an alien, alien turns out to be female, boy get girl, boy gets prickled to death, girl gets pricked to death, The end. it'll be a western, an underwater western. An underwater western with a tragic ending - like romeo and juliet meets the creature friom the black lagoon meets the man from Laramie - can you smoke cigarettes underwater? Underwater tobacco... involved in a range war between the tuna ranchers and the underwater tobacco farmers - the tuna and the seaweed should be friends....One of the girls is a mermaid. He's a fish rancher. This is all good stuff - I can see the movie now - bruce willis and tom cruise as the fish ranchers - brokeback swimming pool - rene zwellwigggg, rene zweleigg, rene zewl... halle berry as the mermaid, angelina jolie as the talking cactus, brad pitt as the underwater tobacco farmer - but he secretly want to be a tuna rodeo rider - oooh I'm excited... bring on the big production number with dancing sharks and woody allen.... no sean connery... in a Carmen Miranda hat.
Where was I - the cactus house - the succulents - the piccies below - I really like the rossette shape of these succulents - it definitely appeals to the mathematical bent in my personality - and I do have a very bent mathematical side to me. The calm side, the logical side - hell - i just like the, okay.




